An issue
which is always contentious is an employer’s ability to impose and enforce
restrictions on former employees working in competition after they have moved
on. It tends to be a fight between whether the restrictions amount to reasonable
measures to protect the employer’s business or unreasonable restrictions
preventing the employee from working elsewhere. With the prospect of expensive
court action hanging over the parties it can sometimes turn into a game of
bluff and counter bluff! I have noticed an interesting recent decision of the
High Court in a case called Patsystems Holding Ltd v Neilly. The Court confirmed that the reasonableness of
a restrictive covenant must be judged at the time it was entered into, not at
the time when the employer sought to enforce it. A subsequent change of
circumstances, such as a promotion, will not turn an invalid covenant into a
valid one. This gives a strong warning to employers to review restrictive
covenants, particularly when an employee is promoted. Ideally, the employer
should seek fresh acceptance of a covenant if circumstances have changed,
either by fresh agreement to the covenant or by asking the employee to sign a
new contract containing the covenant. The employment team at Tolhurst Fisher is
happy to assist with drafting restrictive covenants or advising employees
whether they can be avoided. Contact us on www.tolhurstfisher.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment